Advertisement

The Use of Enteric Contrast in the Emergency Setting

Published:October 19, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2022.09.002

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Radiologic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alabousi A.
        • Patlas M.N.
        • Sne N.
        • et al.
        Is oral contrast necessary for multidetector computed tomography imaging of patients with acute abdominal pain?.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015; 66: 318-322
        • Megibow A.J.
        Oral contrast utilization for abdominal/pelvic CT scanning in today’s emergency room setting.
        Abdom Radiol. 2017; 42: 781-783
        • Winter T.
        A plea for oral contrast administration in CT for emergency department patients.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4223
        • Sokhandon F.
        Oral contrast administration for abdominal and pelvic CT scan in emergency setting: is there a happy medium?.
        Abdom Radiol. 2017; 42: 784-785
        • Lee S.Y.
        • Coughlin B.
        • Wolfe J.M.
        • et al.
        Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients.
        Emerg Radiol. 2006; 12: 150-157
        • Huynh L.N.
        • Coughlin B.F.
        • Wolfe J.
        • et al.
        Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: Oral contrast versus no contrast.
        Emerg Radiol. 2004; 10: 310-313
        • Razavi S.A.
        • Johnson J.O.
        • Kassin M.T.
        • et al.
        The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety.
        Emerg Radiol. 2014; 21: 605-613
        • Levenson R.B.
        • Camacho M.A.
        • Horn E.
        • et al.
        Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: Impact on patient throughput and diagnosis.
        Emerg Radiol. 2012; 19: 513-517
        • Wang Z.J.
        • Chen K.S.
        • Gould R.
        • et al.
        Positive enteric contrast material for abdominal and pelvic CT with automatic exposure control: What is the effect on patient radiation exposure?.
        Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.059
        • Anderson S.W.
        • Soto J.A.
        • Lucey B.C.
        • et al.
        Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: The use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 1282-1288
        • Marks W.M.
        • Goldberg H.I.
        • Moss A.A.
        • et al.
        Intestinal pseudotumors: A problem in abdominal computed tomography solved by directed techniques.
        Gastrointest Radiol. 1980; 5: 155-160
        • Shirkhoda A.
        Diagnostic pitfalls in abdominal CT.
        Radiographics. 1991; 11: 969-1002
        • Griffey R.T.
        • Fowler K.J.
        • Theilen A.
        • et al.
        Considerations in Imaging Among Emergency Department Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 69: 587-599https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.010
        • Callahan M.J.
        • Talmadge J.M.
        • MacDougall R.
        • et al.
        The use of enteric contrast media for diagnostic CT, MRI, and ultrasound in infants and children: A practical approach.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206: 973-979
        • Lim-Dunham J.E.
        • Narra J.
        • Benya E.C.
        • et al.
        Aspiration after administration of oral contrast material in children undergoing abdominal CT for trauma.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169: 1015-1018
        • Federle M.P.
        • Peitzman A.
        • Krugh J.
        Use of oral contrast material in abdominal trauma CT scans: Is it dangerous?.
        J Trauma. 1995; 38: 51-53
        • Donnelly L.F.
        • Frush D.P.
        • Frush K.S.
        Aspirated contrast material contributing to respiratory arrest in a pediatric trauma patient.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 471-473
        • Trulzsch D.V.
        • Penmetsa A.
        • Karim A.
        • et al.
        Gastrografin-induced aspiration pneumonia: A lethal complication of computed tomography.
        South Med J. 1992; 85: 1255-1256
      1. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media, ACR Manual on Contrast Media, 105, 2021. Available at: http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/ContrastManual/2013_Contrast_Media.pdf. Accessed February 01, 2022.

        • Jawad H.
        • Raptis C.
        • Mintz A.
        • et al.
        Single-contrast CT for detecting bowel injuries in penetrating abdominopelvic trauma.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 210: 761-765
        • Gorgun E.
        • Remzi F.H.
        Complications of Ileoanal Pouches.
        Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004; 17: 43-55
        • Bertelsen C.A.
        • Andreasen A.H.
        • Jørgensen T.
        • et al.
        Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: Risk factors.
        Color Dis. 2010; 12: 37-43
        • O’Malley R.B.
        • Revels J.W.
        Imaging of Abdominal Postoperative Complications.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 2020; 58: 73-91
        • Guillem J.G.
        • Cohen A.M.
        Current issues in colorectal cancer surgery.
        Semin Oncol. 1999; 26: 505-513
        • Kauv P.
        • Benadjaoud S.
        • Curis E.
        • et al.
        Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT.
        Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 3543-3551
        • Samji K.B.
        • Kielar A.Z.
        • Connolly M.
        • et al.
        Anastomotic Leaks After Small- and Large-Bowel Surgery: Diagnostic Performance of CT and the Importance of Intraluminal Contrast Administration.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 210: 1259-1265
        • Weinstein S.
        • Osei-Bonsu S.
        • Aslam R.
        • et al.
        Multidetector CT of the postoperative colon: Review of normal appearances and common complications.
        Radiographics. 2013; 33: 515-532
        • Tonolini M.
        • Magistrelli P.
        Enterocutaneous fistulas: a primer for radiologists with emphasis on CT and MRI.
        Insights Imaging. 2017; 8: 537-548
        • Kothari K.
        • Friedman B.
        • Grimaldi G.M.
        • et al.
        Nontraumatic large bowel perforation: spectrum of etiologies and CT findings.
        Abdom Radiol. 2017; 42: 2597-2608
        • Hainaux B.
        • Agneessens E.
        • Bertinotti R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: 1179-1183
        • Wei C.J.
        • Levenson R.B.
        • Lee K.S.
        Diagnostic utility of CT and fluoroscopic esophagography for suspected esophageal perforation in the emergency department.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 215: 631-638
        • Norton-Gregory A.A.
        • Kulkarni N.M.
        • O’connor S.D.
        • et al.
        CT esophagography for evaluation of esophageal perforation.
        Radiographics. 2021; 41: 447-461
        • Oyeniyi B.T.
        • Fox E.E.
        • Scerbo M.
        • et al.
        Trends in 1029 Trauma Deaths at a Level 1 Trauma Center.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 5
        • Mock C.
        • Joshipura M.
        • Arreola-Risa C.
        • et al.
        An estimate of the Number of Lives that Could be Saved through Improvements in Trauma Care Globally.
        World J Surg. 2012; 36: 959-963
        • Wolfman N.T.
        • Bechtold R.E.
        • Scharling E.S.
        • et al.
        Blunt upper abdominal trauma: evaluation by CT.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158: 493-501
        • Wing V.W.
        • Federle M.P.
        • Morris J.A.
        • et al.
        The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1985; 145: 1191-1194
        • Kumar A.
        • Panda A.
        • Gamanagatti S.
        Blunt pancreatic trauma: A persistent diagnostic conundrum?.
        World J Radiol. 2016; 8: 159
        • Inaba K.
        • Branco B.C.
        • Moe D.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of selective nonoperative management of torso gunshot wounds: When is it safe to discharge?.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72: 884-891
        • Múnera F.
        • Morales C.
        • Soto J.A.
        • et al.
        Gunshot Wounds of Abdomen: Evaluation of Stable Patients with Triple-Contrast Helical CT.
        Radiology. 2004; 231: 399-405
        • Chiu W.C.
        • Shanmuganathan K.
        • Mirvis S.E.
        • et al.
        Determining the need for laparotomy in penetrating torso trauma: a prospective study using triple-contrast enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51: 860-869
        • Shanmuganathan K.
        • Mirvis S.E.
        • Chiu W.C.
        • et al.
        Triple-contrast helical CT in penetrating torso trauma: A prospective study to determine peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177: 1247-1256
        • Stafford R.E.
        • McGonigal M.D.
        • Weigelt J.A.
        • et al.
        Oral contrast solution and computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma: A randomized study.
        Arch Surg. 1999; 134: 622-627
        • Lee C.H.
        • Haaland B.
        • Earnest A.
        • et al.
        Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: Meta-analysis and systematic review.
        Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 2513-2521
        • Paes F.M.
        • Durso A.M.
        • Pinto D.S.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of triple-contrast versus single-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for the evaluation of penetrating bowel injury.
        Emerg Radiol. 2022; : 0123456789https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02038-0
        • Saksobhavivat N.
        • Shanmuganathan K.
        • Boscak A.R.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of triple-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for detection of penetrating gastrointestinal injury: a prospective study.
        Eur Radiol. 2016; 26: 4107-4120
        • Shanmuganathan K.
        • Mirvis S.E.
        • Chiu W.C.
        • et al.
        Penetrating torso trauma: Triple-contrast helical CT in peritoneal violation and organ injury - A prospective study in 200 patients.
        Radiology. 2004; 231: 775-784
        • Sharpe J.P.
        • Magnotti L.J.
        • Weinberg J.A.
        • et al.
        Applicability of an established management algorithm for colon injuries following blunt trauma.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74: 419-425
        • Shatnawi N.J.
        • Bani-Hani K.E.
        Management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal injuries.
        Asian J Surg. 2006; 29: 11-16
        • Gumus M.
        • Kapan M.
        • Onder A.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting morbidity in penetrating rectal injuries: a civilian experience.
        Turkish J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011; 17: 401-406
        • Girgin S.
        • Gedik E.
        • Uysal E.
        • et al.
        Independent risk factors of morbidity in penetrating colon injuries.
        Ulus Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009; 15: 232-238
        • Ozimok C.J.
        • Mellnick V.M.
        • Patlas M.N.
        An international survey to assess use of oral and rectal contrast in CT protocols for penetrating torso trauma.
        Emerg Radiol. 2019; 26: 117-121
        • Broder J.S.
        • Hamedani A.G.
        • Liu S.W.
        • et al.
        Emergency Department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography - A national survey and comparison with the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Ariteria.
        J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: 423-433
        • Naeem M.
        • Hoegger M.J.
        • Petraglia F.W.
        • et al.
        CT of penetrating abdominopelvic trauma.
        Radiographics. 2021; 41: 1064-1081
        • Xu A.A.
        • Breeze J.L.
        • Paulus J.K.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of traumatic esophageal injury: An analysis of the national Trauma Data Bank.
        Am Surg. 2019; 85: 342-349
        • Chien M.
        • Habis A.
        • Glynn L.
        • et al.
        Staged imaging pathway for the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2016; 32: 671-678
        • Saito J.M.
        • Yan Y.
        • Evashwick T.W.
        • et al.
        Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging by hospital type in pediatric appendicitis.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1665
        • Garcia E.M.
        • Camacho M.A.
        • Karolyi D.R.
        • et al.
        ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain-Suspected Appendicitis.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: S373-S387
        • Kharbanda A.B.
        • Taylor G.A.
        • Bachur R.G.
        Suspected appendicitis in children: Rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT.
        Radiology. 2007; 243: 520-526
        • Rao P.M.
        • Rhea J.T.
        • Novelline R.A.
        • et al.
        Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169: 1275-1280
        • Mullins M.E.
        • Kircher M.F.
        • Ryan D.P.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 37-41
        • Tang S.J.
        • Pickhardt P.J.
        • Kim D.U.
        • et al.
        Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 213: W211-W217
        • Farrell C.R.
        • Bezinque A.D.
        • Tucker J.M.
        • et al.
        Acute appendicitis in childhood: oral contrast does not improve CT diagnosis.
        Emerg Radiol. 2018; 25: 257-263
        • Papandria D.
        • Goldstein S.D.
        • Rhee D.
        • et al.
        Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis.
        J Surg Res. 2013; 184: 723-729
        • Bickell N.A.
        • Aufses A.H.
        • Rojas M.
        • et al.
        How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 401-406
        • Ramalingam V.
        • Bates D.D.B.
        • Buch K.
        • et al.
        Diagnosing acute appendicitis using a nonoral contrast CT protocol in patients with a BMI of less than 25.
        Emerg Radiol. 2016; 23: 455-462
        • Rao P.M.
        • Rhea J.T.
        • Novelline R.A.
        • et al.
        Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: Prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination.
        Radiology. 1997; 202: 130-144
        • Anderson S.W.
        • Rhea J.T.
        • Milch H.N.
        • et al.
        Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT.
        Emerg Radiol. 2010; 17: 445-453
        • Kepner A.M.
        • Bacasnot J.V.
        • Stahlman B.A.
        Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 1765-1773
        • Wadhwani A.
        • Guo L.
        • Saude E.
        • et al.
        Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016; 67: 234-241
        • Patel K.
        • Zha N.
        • Neumann S.
        • et al.
        Computed Tomography of Common Bowel Emergencies.
        Semin Roentgenol. 2020; 55: 150-169
        • Chang K.J.
        • Marin D.
        • Kim D.H.
        • et al.
        ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: S305-S314
        • Branco B.C.
        • Barmparas G.
        • Schnüriger B.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction.
        Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 470-478
        • Ceresoli M.
        • Coccolini F.
        • Catena F.
        • et al.
        Water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic value.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 211: 1114-1125
        • Zielinski M.D.
        • Haddad N.N.
        • Cullinane D.C.
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 83: 47-54
        • Scotté M.
        • Mauvais F.
        • Bubenheim M.
        • et al.
        Use of water-soluble contrast medium (gastrografin) does not decrease the need for operative intervention nor the duration of hospital stay in uncomplicated acute adhesive small bowel obstruction? A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (Adhesive Small.
        Surgery (United States). 2017; 161: 1315-1325
        • Vather R.
        • Josephson R.
        • Jaung R.
        • et al.
        Gastrografin in prolonged postoperative ileus: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 262: 23-30
        • Biondo S.
        • Miquel J.
        • Espin-Basany E.
        • et al.
        A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Study on the Therapeutic Effect of Gastrografin® in Prolonged Postoperative Ileus after Elective Colorectal Surgery.
        World J Surg. 2016; 40: 206-214
        • Khasawneh M.A.
        • Ugarte M.L.M.
        • Srvantstian B.
        • et al.
        Role of Gastrografin Challenge in Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18: 363-368
        • Khasawneh M.A.
        • Eiken P.W.
        • Srvantstyan B.
        • et al.
        Use of the Gastrografin challenge in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic malignancy.
        Surg (United States). 2013; 154: 769-776
        • D’Agostino R.
        • Ali N.S.
        • Leshchinskiy S.
        • et al.
        Small bowel obstruction and the gastrografin challenge.
        Abdom Radiol. 2018; 43: 2945-2954
        • Hunter Lanier M.
        • Ludwig D.R.
        • Ilahi O.
        • et al.
        Prognostic Value of Water-Soluble Contrast Challenge for Nonadhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2022; 234: 121-128
        • Woolen S.A.
        • Maturen K.E.
        • Nettles A.
        • et al.
        Patient-Centered Assessment of the Value of Oral Contrast Material.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1626-1631
        • Kammerer S.
        • Höink A.J.
        • Wessling J.
        • et al.
        Abdominal and pelvic CT: is positive enteric contrast still necessary? Results of a retrospective observational study.
        Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 669-678