Advertisement

MR Imaging of the Lower Limb

Pitfalls, Tricks, and Tips
Published:December 26, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2022.10.010

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Radiologic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cekdemir Y.E.
        • Mutlu U.
        • Karaman G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of computed tomography images of calcaneus for estimation of sex.
        Radiologia Med. 2021; 126: 1064-1073
        • Albano D.
        • Bonifacini C.
        • Zannoni S.
        • et al.
        Plantar forefoot pain: ultrasound findings before and after treatment with custom-made foot orthoses.
        Radiologia Med. 2021; 126: 963-970
        • Tall M.A.
        • Thompson A.K.
        • Greer B.
        • et al.
        The pearls and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41: 873-886
        • Bencardino J.T.
        • Rosenberg Z.S.
        Normal variants and pitfalls in MR imaging of the ankle and foot.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001; 9 (x): 447-463
        • Gyftopoulos S.
        • Bencardino J.T.
        Normal variants and pitfalls in MR imaging of the ankle and foot.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010; 18: 691-705
        • LiMarzi G.M.
        • Scherer K.F.
        • Richardson M.L.
        • et al.
        CT and MR Imaging of the Postoperative Ankle and Foot.
        Radiographics. 2016; 36: 1828-1848
        • Barile A.
        • Conti L.
        • Lanni G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of medial meniscus tears and meniscal stability: weight-bearing MRI vs arthroscopy.
        Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82: 633-639
        • Bruno F.
        • Arrigoni F.
        • Palumbo P.
        • et al.
        Weight-bearing MR Imaging of Knee, Ankle and Foot.
        Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019; 23: 594-602
        • Oei E.H.
        • Ginai A.Z.
        • Hunink M.G.
        MRI for traumatic knee injury: a review.
        Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007; 28: 141-157
        • Mohankumar R.
        • White L.M.
        • Naraghi A.
        Pitfalls and pearls in MRI of the knee.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 516-530
        • Naraghi A.
        • White L.
        MRI evaluation of the postoperative knee: special considerations and pitfalls.
        Clin Sports Med. 2006; 25: 703-725
        • Bruno F.
        • Goderecci R.
        • Barile A.
        • et al.
        Comparative evaluation of meniscal pathology: MRI vs arthroscopy.
        J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019; 33 (XIX Congresso Nazionale S I C O O P Societa' Italiana Chirurghi Ortopedici Dell'ospedalita' Privata Accreditata): 9-14
        • Masciocchi C.
        • Barile A.
        • Lelli S.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthro-MRI in the evaluation of the chondral pathology of the knee joint.
        Radiol Med. 2004; 108: 149-158
        • Barile A.
        • Bruno F.
        • Arrigoni F.
        • et al.
        Emergency and Trauma of the Ankle.
        Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017; 21: 282-289
        • Masciocchi C.
        • Barile A.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of the hindfoot with surgical correlations.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2002; 31: 131-142
        • Huang M.
        • Li Y.
        • Li H.
        • et al.
        Correlation between knee anatomical angles and anterior cruciate ligament injury in males.
        Radiologia Med. 2021; 126: 1201-1206
        • Vanhoenacker F.
        • De Vos N.
        • Van Dyck P.
        Common Mistakes and Pitfalls in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee.
        J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016; 100: 99
        • Bruno F.
        • Barile A.
        • Arrigoni F.
        • et al.
        Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of advantages and limits.
        Acta Biomed. 2018; 89: 78-88
        • Mariani S.
        • La Marra A.
        • Arrigoni F.
        • et al.
        Dynamic measurement of patello-femoral joint alignment using weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI).
        Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84: 2571-2578
        • Oei E.H.
        • Nikken J.J.
        • Verstijnen A.C.
        • et al.
        MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review.
        Radiology. 2003; 226: 837-848
        • Laloo F.
        • De La Hoz Polo M.
        • Haque S.
        Imaging Pitfall in the Pediatric Knee: Irregular Epiphyseal Ossification at the Femoral Condyle.
        J Belg Soc Radiol. 2021; 105: 84
        • Liu Y.W.
        • Skalski M.R.
        • Patel D.B.
        • et al.
        The anterior knee: normal variants, common pathologies, and diagnostic pitfalls on MRI.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 47: 1069-1086
        • Bolog N.V.
        • Andreisek G.
        Reporting knee meniscal tears: technical aspects, typical pitfalls and how to avoid them.
        Insights Imaging. 2016; 7: 385-398
        • Sakamoto F.A.
        • Winalski C.S.
        • Schils J.P.
        • et al.
        Vacuum phenomenon: prevalence and appearance in the knee with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40: 1275-1285
        • Turner D.A.
        • Rapoport M.I.
        • Erwin W.D.
        • et al.
        Truncation artifact: a potential pitfall in MR imaging of the menisci of the knee.
        Radiology. 1991; 179: 629-633
        • Albano D.
        • Cortese M.C.
        • Duarte A.
        • et al.
        Predictive role of ankle MRI for tendon graft choice and surgical reconstruction.
        Radiol Med. 2020; 125: 763-769
        • Shortt C.P.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of the midfoot and forefoot: normal variants and pitfalls.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010; 18: 707-715
        • Mengiardi B.
        • Pfirrmann C.W.
        • Vienne P.
        • et al.
        Anterior tibial tendon abnormalities: MR imaging findings.
        Radiology. 2005; 235: 977-984
        • Vora B.M.K.
        • Wong B.S.S.
        Common accessory ossicles of the foot: imaging features, pitfalls and associated pathology.
        Singapore Med J. 2018; 59: 183-189
        • Szaro P.
        • Polaczek M.
        • Swiatkowski J.
        • et al.
        How to increase the accuracy of the diagnosis of the accessory bone of the foot?.
        Radiol Med. 2020; 125: 188-196
        • Rossi I.
        • Rosenberg Z.
        • Zember J.
        Normal skeletal development and imaging pitfalls of the calcaneal apophysis: MRI features.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45: 483-493
        • Ekstrom J.E.
        • Shuman W.P.
        • Mack L.A.
        MR imaging of accessory soleus muscle.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990; 14: 239-242
        • Yu J.S.
        • Resnick D.
        MR imaging of the accessory soleus muscle appearance in six patients and a review of the literature.
        Skeletal Radiol. 1994; 23: 525-528